Super fact 38 : If two observers are moving compared to each other both will observe the other’s time as being slower. In other words, both observers will observe the other’s clocks as ticking slower. Time slowing down is referred to as Time Dilation. And this post is about how time dilation goes both ways.
A lot of people know that if someone moves very fast his clocks will run slower. That’s relativity. If someone speeds through space in a rocket ship, close to the speed of light his time will slow down. When one hour passes on earth only half an hour may pass in the rocket. What comes as a shock to many people is when they find out that the converse is also true. When one hour passes in the rocket only half an hour will pass on earth.
Clearly that looks like a contradiction, but there is an explanation. I consider this a super fact because it is so strange and almost impossible for people to believe, and yet it is true.

Postulates of Special Relativity
The two postulates of special relativity are:
- The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference. An inertial frame is a system that moves at a constant velocity.
- The speed of light in a vacuum is constant for all observers, regardless of the motion of the light source.
The first postulate is called the principle of relativity and goes all the way back to Galileo Galilei. It means that no experiment can determine whether you are at rest or moving at a constant velocity. The reciprocity of time dilation follows from this postulate. If the time for the rocket man in the example above was ticking at half the speed compared to the time for the guy on earth and they both agreed, then you could tell who was standing still and who was moving from that fact.
The first postulate demands that they disagree. The guy on earth thinks the rocket man’s clock is ticking at half the speed of his own clock, whilst the rocket man think it is earth man’s clock that is going slow. Therefore, you can’t tell who is standing still, which is what the first postulate requires.
The second postulate is the more shocking one and is special to relativity. It was discovered experimentally at the end of the 19th century but was too difficult for scientists to accept at first so various ad hoc explanations were put forth to explain it away, until the theories of relativity were created. I designated this postulate as my super fact #4 and you can read about it here.

Time Dilation
In the pictures below I am showing two rocket systems in space, Amy’s rocket and Alan’s rocket. They are travelling at a high speed compared to each other. Each rocket has a light clock that consists of a light beam bouncing up and down between a mirror in the ceiling and a mirror on the floor. The two light clocks are identical, and each bounce corresponds to a microsecond.
Amy is passing Alan at a high speed, and therefore Alan will see Amy’s light clock running slower than his because Amy’s light beam must travel further. Remember, the speed of light is identical for both light clocks (light speed is a universal constant). For those interested I am also deriving the formula for time dilation.

Since Amy moving left is the same as Amy standing still and Alan moving right you can say that Alan is the one moving fast. In this case it is Alan’s light clock that is ticking slower because from this viewpoint it is his light beam that has to travel further. From Amy’s perspective it is Alan’s clock that is going slower.

This seemingly contradictory situation is resolved by the fact that Amy’s and Alan’s perspectives will drift apart as they continue their journey. They will increasingly disagree on whether events are simultaneous or not, and they will disagree in which order events occur. This is another shocking fact, or as I refer to it, super fact. It is strange but it resolves the apparent contradiction of reciprocal time dilation. I am explaining this in greater detail in this post.
The Twin Paradox
But what happens if one of Amy or Alan decides to turn around so that they meet up again. If Amy’s clock runs slower from Alan’s perspective and Alan’s clock runs slower from Amy’s perspective, how can you reconcile that when they meet up again? It turns out that whoever is turning around or accelerating or decelerating to turn back is the one who will have the least time pass. If Amy is the one turning back, then she will age less than Alan. During her acceleration she will see Alan’s clock starting to run faster and faster until he is older her.
Let say Alan’s clock is running half the speed of Amy’s clock from Amy’s perspective and Amy’s clock is running half the speed of Alan’s clock from Alan’s perspective. Let’s also say that Amy traveled to the left for 10 years before turning around.
From Alan’s perspective she would have traveled 20 years before turning around. However, from Amy’s perspective 5 years would have passed on Alan’s clock. As she turns around Alan’s clock will run faster and catch up so that when they meet up again Amy will be aged 20 years, while Alan will be aged 40 years. That is 35 years of catching up for Alan’s clock from Amy’s perspective. Alan’s clock advanced 35 years from Amy’s perspective after Amy turned around. In the end Amy will be the younger one.

A somewhat halting but OK analogy for the 35 years of catching up that happens on Alan’s clock from Amy’s perspective is when you turn a boat around on a wavy sea. As you are moving in the direction of the waves the waves will hit you much less often (if at all) but after you turn around and move against them the waves will hit your boat very frequently. Alan’s clock will run faster for Amy whilst she is turning around.
Book Recommendations on Relativity
- Relativity Visualized by Lewis Carrol Epstein. This book does not require much education in physics and very little math, and yet it explains relativity very well.
- Relativity, The Special and the General Theory, by Albert Einstein. In my opinion, not the best overall, but it is easy reading for the public and the chapter on the relativity of simultaneity is pretty good.
- Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei and Particles by Robert Eisberg and Robert Resnick. An advanced but excellent explanation of special relativity in the appendix.
- The Special Theory of Relativity by David Bohm. It is written for people with some physics education. However, it is one of the best books on Special Relativity that I’ve read.
- Einstein’s Miraculous Year. This book features the translations of the five famous papers that Albert Einstein wrote in 1905 including “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”, which was his paper on Special Relativity. Not for the faint of heart but very interesting.
I must admit, I had not heard of this Thomas. Very interesting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Robbie. There are many surprises in modern physics (well physics less than 120 years old). That’s one reason I love it. If it is your thing and you like to study it you will have lots of “wow I never knew” and “that’s hard to believe” experiences. The Universe is strange.
LikeLike
Yes, you are right about that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for this explanation, Thomas. These topics are usually obscure to me, but this made sense. The illustrations helped.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much for your kind words Audrey
LikeLiked by 1 person
Java Bean: “Ayyy, is it just me, or does this contradict that whole ‘Live Fast, Die Young’ thing I’ve heard about?”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha ha it is travel fast and live long instead.
LikeLike
All very fascinating Thomas. Admittedly, physics was never my strongpoint, so I like the way you broke it down with diagrams. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much for your kind comment Debby. I agree it is fascinating. Counterintuitive but fascinating.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the concise yet comprehensive refresher on time dilation!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much David
LikeLiked by 1 person
A fascinating topic, Thomas, and one I admittedly have trouble understanding. Your explanations and illustrations helped a lot. Thank you! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much for your kind words Debbie
LikeLiked by 1 person